talking polar bears were actually in Philip Pullman's original book, and also because the filmmakers felt like messing with us, because as if it's not hard enough to keep from getting Ian McKellen and Ian McShane confused, they go ahead and collaborate in the form of polar bears. Oh, they probably just put them in because. No, this is still too anti-Christian to be like the overtly pro-Christian "Narnia" series, so much so that they seem to be making fun of Republicans (I don't know if they're poking fun at Ann Coulter, but I'm starting to get a little more confident that I'm the only non-religious Conservative in America), no matter how much they try to evoke thoughts of Aslan the lion god with these awesome, anthropomorphic polar bears. Wow, in a discussion regarding this film, I found a way to address Ann Coulter, so this probably isn't as exciting as the "Chronicles of Narnia" rip-off I was expecting it to be, although it does feel like a rip-off of a rip-off.
Shoot, forget organized religion, this might be a deconstruction of the conservative republican party, because I'm not entirely confident that they're not trying to say something when they name the evil, female political figure in this film Mrs. or almost two hours of mostly exposition and allegorical deconstructions of organized religion. We're talking about a futuristic world, spirit animals, warrior polar bears, James Bond as an adventurous college professor (British Indy!) and Sam Elliott as a cowboy aeronaut, so this is either going to be an awesome definitive fantasy epic.
0 kommentar(er)
